Agentic SOC vs SOAR: Multi-Agent Workflows in SecOps

Individual AI agents handling specific tasks are one level of AI capability in security operations. Agentic workflows — multiple agents orchestrated in defined sequences, each building on the previous agent's output — represent a meaningfully different capability level.

Let me describe a concrete example from our production deployments, because abstraction is less useful than specificity here.

For high-confidence credential anomaly detections — a scenario type we see regularly across our customer base — we have deployed an agentic investigation workflow that handles the initial investigation pipeline automatically.

• The Enrichment Agent: Retrieves the complete contextual picture for the detection: the full asset profile for every system involved, the complete identity profile for the account, the behavioral baseline context showing what is anomalous and by how much, and current threat intelligence relevance for the observed behavioral pattern.
• The Scope Assessment Agent: Traverses the access relationship graph from the flagged account to identify the blast radius if the compromise is confirmed: which systems are directly or one-hop accessible, what data repositories are reachable, what other accounts can be accessed from the initially reachable systems.
• The Investigation Synthesis Agent: Queries historical telemetry for related activity: earlier behavioral anomalies involving this account or these systems, previous investigation findings in this environment with similar characteristics, lateral authentication events in the window preceding the detection.
• The Report Generation Agent: Synthesizes all of the above into a structured investigation summary with recommended investigation steps, prioritized by the risk assessment produced by the preceding agents.

This workflow runs in seconds. The analyst receives a complete investigation starting picture rather than a raw alert requiring 20-30 minutes of manual context assembly.

Governance Safeguards for Multi-Agent Orchestration

The governance requirements for agentic workflows are higher than for individual agents, because errors can propagate through the sequence. Several safeguards are non-negotiable in our design.

Explicit Handoff Validation: Each agent's output is evaluated against explicit quality criteria before being passed forward. If the enrichment agent returns incomplete data, the workflow halts and routes to human review rather than propagating the gap downstream.

Circuit Breakers: Unexpected output or anomalous scoring at any step triggers immediate escalation.

Full Auditability: Every step produces a complete, immutable record of inputs, outputs, and underlying reasoning traces.

Conservative Action Gating: The workflow handles analysis and context gathering autonomously, but routes any consequential action - host isolation, account blocking, firewall changes - to human approval regardless of workflow confidence.

The operational value is significant. The governance discipline is what makes it durable.

*Part of my ongoing series on data science and the future of security operations.*

 
About the Author